Open call to join new studies launched by the VL research community
Two new Study Groups, a collaboration between IDDO and the global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) research community, have been formed to answer specific research questions about treatments. They will undertake individual patient data meta-analyses using datasets from multiple studies, across sub-populations of interest, to help explore sources of between-study heterogeneity in therapeutic responses. Colleagues from across the VL research community are invited to join.

One Group will explore Anaemia among patients with VL and haematological dynamics post treatment and aim to characterise the haematological parameters at baseline and during the initial treatment and in the ensuing follow-up period using individual participant data hosted at IDDO VL data platform.
The other will look at Host, parasite, and drug determinants of therapeutic responses. There is a marked regional heterogeneity in therapeutic response against antileishmanial therapies in VL. Single dose Liposomal Amphotericin B remains the current first line therapy in the Indian subcontinent due to the emergence and evolution of drug resistant parasites against pentavalent antinomy (PA). However, PA in combination with Paromomycin has demonstrated a high efficacy in Africa and continues to be used as a first line therapy. Such heterogeneity in therapeutic responses has been thought to arise due to regional differences in parasite sensitivity/susceptibility. The importance of host and drug parameters as a determinant of observed differences in clinical response demand further investigations.
Both Study Groups will be co-led by Dr Prabin Dahal and Dr Sauman Singh. Colleagues from the VL research community interested in joining the Study Groups should email vl@iddo.org for more information.
Prabin Dahal, one of the study co-leads remarked: “Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis is increasingly recognised as a gold-standard method for evidence synthesis. It allows a more thorough and flexible analysis to be undertaken that would otherwise not be possible through published aggregate data. For example, the number of relapses in any single trials are few. Pooling IPD from several studies would allow us to explore the host, parasite and drug determinants of relapses which can be used to inform optimal case management. These study groups are therefore a unique opportunity for the global VL community to answer some of the long standing questions related to disease and the drugs.“
VL, also known as kala-azar, is transmitted to humans through the bites from infected female phlebotomine sand flies. If left untreated, it is fatal in 95% of cases. Globally, it is estimated there are up to 22,000 new cases of VL each year which occur in Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan and Sudan.
IDDO is a scientifically independent, multi-disciplinary coalition of the global infectious disease community. It is unique among data-sharing initiatives in taking many different types of data and standardising these to create larger-scale datasets to enable global research collaborations to pose new scientific questions.
IDDO to share latest research at ECTMIH 2021
Join the IDDO team who will be presenting at the 12th European Congress on Tropical Medicine and International Health (ECTMIH) between 28 September to 1 October. ECTMIH provides a platform for experts, scientists and researchers to present scientific developments and breakthroughs in tropical medicine and global health, and strengthens networks and creates new partnerships.

IDDO is looking forward to sharing some of our recent work on malaria, COVID-19 and visceral leishmaniasis (VL) during the virtual conference hosted from Bergen, Norway.
- Dr Prabin Dahal will present his new paper Visceral Leishmaniasis in pregnancy and vertical transmission: A systematic literature review on the therapeutic orphans .
- Dr Dahal will also be presenting two posters, the first is called ‘Methodological variations in design and conduct of visceral leishmaniasis clinical trials: A systematic review’ and the second is titled ‘Haemoglobin at inclusion in visceral leishmaniasis clinical studies: A systematic review and proposal for an individual patient data meta-analysis’. Find out more about our VL work here.
- Dr Kasia Stepniewska will present a poster on her work in malaria titled, ‘Optimisation of single-dose primaquine used with artemisinin combination therapy for reduction of Plasmodium falciparum transmission: WWARN Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses.
- And Dr Alistair McLean will present a poster on his COVID-19 research, called ‘Characteristics of COVID-19 clinical trial registration investigating priority pharmacological treatments: a complex landscape’ . Find out more about our COVID=19 work here.
View the event website for more information and follow #ECTMIH2021 updates on Twitter @ectmih2021 using the #ECTMIH2021 hashtag and visit us at @IDDOnews
Visceral Leishmaniasis in pregnancy and vertical transmission: A systematic literature review on the therapeutic orphans
This work is cited in the new VL-HIV WHO guidelines - page 30
Abstract
Background
Reports on the occurrence and outcome of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) in pregnant women is rare in published literature. The occurrence of VL in pregnancy is not systematically captured and cases are rarely followed-up to detect consequences of infection and treatment on the mother and foetus.
Methods
A review of all published literature was undertaken to identify cases of VL infections among pregnant women by searching the following database: Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; World Health Organization Global Index Medicus: LILACS (Americas); IMSEAR (South-East Asia); IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean); WPRIM (Western Pacific); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Selection criteria included any clinical reports describing the disease in pregnancy or vertical transmission of the disease in humans. Articles meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria and non-primary research articles such as textbook, chapters, letters, retrospective case description, or reports of accidental inclusion in trials were also considered.
Results
The systematic literature search identified 272 unique articles of which 54 records were included in this review; a further 18 records were identified from additional search of the references of the included studies or from personal communication leading to a total of 72 records (71 case reports/case series; 1 retrospective cohort study; 1926–2020) describing 451 cases of VL in pregnant women. The disease was detected during pregnancy in 398 (88.2%), retrospectively confirmed after giving birth in 52 (11.5%), and the time of identification was not clear in 1 (0.2%). Of the 398 mothers whose infection was identified during pregnancy, 346 (86.9%) received a treatment, 3 (0.8%) were untreated, and the treatment status was not clear in the remaining 49 (12.3%). Of 346 mothers, Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) was administered in 202 (58.4%) and pentavalent antimony (PA) in 93 (26.9%). Outcomes were reported in 176 mothers treated with L-AmB with 4 (2.3%) reports of maternal deaths, 5 (2.8%) miscarriages, and 2 (1.1%) foetal death/stillbirth. For PA, outcomes were reported in 88 mothers of whom 4 (4.5%) died, 24 (27.3%) had spontaneous abortion, 2 (2.3%) had miscarriages. A total of 26 cases of confirmed, probable or suspected cases of vertical transmission were identified with a median detection time of 6 months (range: 0–18 months).
Conclusions
Outcomes of VL treatment during pregnancy is rarely reported and under-researched. The reported articles were mainly case reports and case series and the reported information was often incomplete. From the studies identified, it is difficult to derive a generalisable information on outcomes for mothers and babies, although reported data favours the usage of liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of VL in pregnant women.
Author summary
Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease with an estimated incidence of 50,000 to 90,000 cases in 2019. Women who are susceptible to becoming pregnant or those who are pregnant and lactating are regularly excluded from clinical studies of VL. A specific concern of public health relevance is the little knowledge of the consequences of VL and its treatment on the mother and the foetus. We did a systematic review of all published literature with an overarching aim of identifying cases of VL in pregnancy and assessing the risk-benefit balance of antileishmanial treatment to the mother and the child. We identified a total of 72 records (1926–2020) describing 451 VL cases in pregnant women. In 398 mothers, infection was identified during pregnancy of whom 202 received Liposomal Amphotericin B (L-AmB) and 93 received pentavalent antimony (PA). In studies that reported maternal outcomes, reports of maternal death abortion/spontaneous abortion, and miscarriages were proportionally lower among those who received L-AmB compared to PA (no formal test of significance carried out). A total of 26 cases of confirmed, probable or suspected cases of vertical transmission were identified and the median time to detection was 6 months (range: 0–18 months). Our review brings together scattered observations of VL in pregnant women in the clinical literature and clearly highlights that the disease in pregnancy is under-reported and under-studied. The collated evidence derived mainly from case reports and case series indicate that L-AmB has a favourable safety profile than the antimony regimen and should be the preferred treatment for VL during pregnancy.
The scale of the problem of VL in pregnancy is underestimated
A new systematic review published today in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases has found that reports on the occurrence of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) in pregnant women are rare in published literature, are not systematically captured, and cases are rarely followed-up to detect the consequences of infection and treatment on the pregnant woman and foetus.
This work is cited in the new VL-HIV WHO guidelines - page 30

The review, Visceral Leishmaniasis in pregnancy and vertical transmission: A systematic literature review on the therapeutic orphans identifies reported cases and assesses the risk-benefit balance of antileishmanial therapies to the pregnant woman and the child. It brings together scattered observations of VL in pregnant women in the clinical literature and highlights that the disease in pregnancy is under-reported and under-studied. The authors found that information was often incomplete and it was difficult to derive generalisable information on outcomes, however, the findings suggest that liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) should be the preferred treatment for VL during pregnancy.
In practice, pregnant and lactating women are regularly excluded from clinical studies and are considered “therapeutic orphans”. IDDO researchers have previously found that existing knowledge on drug efficacy is derived from a study population that is heavily skewed towards adult males while, substantially less is known about the optimal treatment response in female patients. This means that existing therapeutic guidelines regarding drug usage in pregnancy are guided by limited evidence generated from case reports and small case series.
A recent IDDO large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis collating all reported serious adverse events (SAE) in VL clinical studies and quantifying the incidence of mortality during the first 30 days of therapy, found that mortality following treatment was an extremely rare event and SAEs were poorly reported. However, regulatory restrictions and the limited evidence on the safety of antileishmanial chemotherapeutics during pregnancy have meant that historically, clinicians had to rely on personal experience or limited published case-reports. This led to delays in treatment or it only being given when the adjudicated risk of VL to the pregnant women outweighed the risk posed by the drug.
Better understanding of the treatment of VL in pregnancy is important because of the severe impact of VL on pregnant women in low-income settings.
A leading scientist on the epidemiology of VL in the East African region, Professor Ahmed Musa, of IEND, University of Khartoum, said: “As a chronic illness visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is usually a barrier to pregnancy or causes miscarriage early on. However, in cases where the pregnancy continues, it often results in stillbirth or the child is born with some parasites and develops VL and in the majority of cases it is fatal. The added complication of access to limited rural health facilities means that VL in pregnant women is often undiagnosed and resulting in under-reporting in regional or national health statistics and to scant literature.”
One of the paper’s authors Dr Fabiana Alves, Head of Visceral Leishmaniasis Disease at Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), said: “This is the most comprehensive review of visceral leishmaniasis in pregnant women and vertical transmission of leishmaniasis to date. Despite the limitations and paucity of data, this review confirms that liposomal amphotericin B is the safest treatment option for pregnant women, and it is critical to ensure access to L-AmB as a treatment of choice for this patient population. Prospectively, a pregnancy registry to systematically record data on pregnant women treated for visceral leishmaniasis should be promoted.”
This new paper aims to assess the risk-benefit balance of antileishmanial therapies to the pregnant woman and the child and to identify the cases of vertical transmission. It is the third in a series of systematic reviews aimed at enhancing the understanding about treatments for VL.
- The first study, carried out by IDDO researchers, found that existing knowledge on drug efficacy is derived from a study population that is heavily skewed towards adult males while, substantially less is known about the optimal treatment response in female patients. Despite an ongoing trend for a decreasing proportion of males being enrolled in antileishmanial therapeutic efficacy trials over time, there are still 1.8 times as many males as females enrolled in clinical trials.
- The second study, a large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis collating all reported serious adverse events (SAE) in VL clinical studies and quantifying the incidence of mortality during the first 30 days of therapy, found that mortality following treatment was an extremely rare event and serious adverse events following treatments were poorly reported.
VL is a neglected tropical disease caused by Leishmania sp. parasites transmitted by female sandflies. The disease is endemic in parts of South Asia, East Africa, South America and the Mediterranean region, with an estimated 50,000 to 90,000 cases in 2019. A specific concern of public health relevance is the little knowledge of the consequences of VL and its treatment on the mother and the foetus.
For this review, IDDO screened 272 publications and identified a total of 72 records (1926–2020) describing 451 VL cases in pregnant women - read the full text of Visceral Leishmaniasis in pregnancy and vertical transmission: A systematic literature review on the therapeutic orphans.
About IDDO’s VL living systematic review library of clinical studies
The Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO) VL clinical trials library has indexed 180 therapeutic efficacy studies published between 1983 through 2019. The library is a living systematic review, and the database is continually updated every six months in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic-Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The trial library indexes publications identified from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, Global Index Medicus, IMEMR, IMSEAR, and LILACS.

Jennie joined IDDO in May 2021. As a Data Manager, she manages and transforms diverse clinical and epidemiological data sets that are submitted to IDDO.
She has a Master of Science in Nutritional Sciences from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign where she expanded her knowledge and interest in nutrition and infectious diseases such as Malaria.
Join IDDO at this year’s BSP Conference in June
This year’s BSP Conference will run across two streams: the usual science stream with its mix of varied high quality themed scientific sessions, keynote speakers and presentations by postgraduate and postdoctoral researchers, and a second, specialist stream which will include a series of talks from IDDO.

IDDO’s Director Professor Philippe Guérin will open the event with his plenary ‘Exploring the re-use of existing data for poverty-related diseases – a scientific or an ethical imperative or both?' at 10 am (BST) on Monday, 21 June, 2021. This will be followed by other talks that day from IDDO collaborators:
- From 11am to 11.40am: Professor Mitali Chatterjee, a Professor of Pharmacology at the Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (IPGMER), Kolkata, India and chair of IDDO’s visceral leishmaniasis Scientific Advisory Committee; and Dr Prabin Dahal, a Post-doctoral researcher with IDDO, will present ‘Methodological challenges in measuring drug efficacy for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis’.
- From 11.45am to 12.25pm: Dr Martin Walker, assistant professor at the Royal Veterinary College, University of London, and IDDO Senior Scientist, will discuss work in developing a research agenda for a sharing and reuse of clinical data on schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiases.
- From 12.45pm to 1.25pm: Dr Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft, Director of Neglected Tropical Diseases with the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, DNDi, will discuss the ‘Value of a data platform for drug development and for regulatory agencies: the case of Chagas disease’.
- From 1.30pm to 2.10pm: Professor Sir Nicholas White, Professor of Tropical Medicine at the University of Oxford and also Professor at Mahidol University in Thailand and IDDO board member, will reflect on the achievements of 10 years of the WWARN global malaria clinical data platform.
The BSP meeting takes place over five-days from June 21st to the 25th. Thanks to the design of the virtual conference interface there will be plenty of opportunities for interaction, through live Q&A sessions, breakout discussion rooms and virtual trade stands for our exhibitors and sponsors.
The conference will include a mix of high-quality themed scientific sessions, keynote speakers and presentations, as well as interactive poster sessions giving delegates the opportunity for discussion with poster presenters.
Visceral leishmaniasis Data Inventory
Case report form for uncomplicated VL - user guide
Serious adverse events following treatment of visceral leishmaniasis
This document contains the data used for the 'Serious adverse events following treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis'
Serious adverse events following treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Despite a historical association with poor tolerability, a comprehensive review on safety of antileishmanial chemotherapies is lacking. We carried out an update of a previous systematic review of all published clinical trials in visceral leishmaniasis (VL) from 1980 to 2019 to document any reported serious adverse events (SAEs).
Methods
For this updated systematic review, we searched the following databases from 1st Jan 2016 through 2nd of May 2019: PUBMED, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and the Global Index Medicus. We included randomised and non-randomised interventional studies aimed at assessing therapeutic efficacy and extracted the number of SAEs reported within the first 30 days of treatment initiation. The incidence rate of death (IRD) from individual treatment arms were combined in a meta-analysis using random effects Poisson regression.
Results
We identified 157 published studies enrolling 35,376 patients in 347 treatment arms. Pentavalent antimony was administered in 74 (21.3%), multiple-dose liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in 52 (15.0%), amphotericin b deoxycholate in 51 (14.7%), miltefosine in 33 (9.5%), amphotericin b fat/lipid/colloid/cholesterol in 31 (8.9%), and single-dose L-AmB in 17 (4.9%) arms. There was a total of 804 SAEs reported of which 793 (including 428 deaths) were extracted at study arm level (11 SAEs were reported at study level only). During the first 30 days, there were 285 (66.6%) deaths with the overall IRD estimated at 0.068 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.041–0.114; I2 = 81.4%; 95% prediction interval (PI): 0.001–2.779] per 1,000 person-days at risk; the rate was 0.628 [95% CI: 0.368–1.021; I2 = 82.5%] in Eastern Africa, and 0.041 [95% CI: 0.021–0.081; I2 = 68.1%] in the Indian Subcontinent. In 21 study arms which clearly indicated allowing the inclusion of patients with HIV co-infections the IRD was 0.575 [95% CI: 0.244–1.355; I2 = 91.9%] compared to 0.043 [95% CI: 0.020–0.090; I2 = 62.5%] in 160 arms which excluded HIV co-infections.
Conclusion
Mortality within the first 30 days of VL treatment initiation was a rarely reported event in clinical trials with an overall estimated rate of 0.068 deaths per 1,000 person-days at risk, though it varied across regions and patient populations. These estimates may serve as a benchmark for future trials against which mortality data from prospective and pharmacovigilance studies can be compared. The methodological limitations exposed by our review support the need to assemble individual patient data (IPD) to conduct robust IPD meta-analyses and generate stronger evidence from existing trials to support treatment guidelines and guide future research.